Focused laser pulses drew touchable points of plasma light

A 2015 paper describes femtosecond laser pulses igniting light in air at up to 200,000 points a second.

Historical event

June 22, 2015

First source published

June 22, 2015

Site publication

September 18, 2026

What the record documents

A paper titled 'Fairy Lights in Femtoseconds', posted to arXiv on 22 June 2015 by Yoichi Ochiai, Kota Kumagai, Takayuki Hoshi, Jun Rekimoto, Satoshi Hasegawa and Yoshio Hayasaki, describes generating small points of light directly in open air by focusing femtosecond laser pulses to a point. The paper was later published in ACM Transactions on Graphics; its publication record dates the peer-reviewed version to February 2016 online and May 2016 in print, timing consistent with the associated SIGGRAPH presentation in 2016. The arXiv preprint and the published version describe the same experiments; this entry treats the preprint as the primary technical source, since it is the version this review could open directly in full.

What creates the point of light

The paper's abstract states that 'a high-intensity laser excites a physical matter to emit light at an arbitrary 3D position', meaning the pulse is focused tightly enough in ordinary air to briefly ionise the gas there into a small burst of glowing plasma. Move the focus point fast enough, tracing a path with a spatial light modulator or scanning mirrors, and persistence of vision turns a rapid sequence of these tiny glowing points into an apparent line or shape hanging in mid-air with nothing solid supporting it. The paper reports two scanning approaches reaching 4,000 and 200,000 points drawn per second respectively, and states the resulting working volume is 'up to 1 cm3', noting the size 'is scalable depending on the optical devices and their setup' - a claim about future systems, not a demonstrated larger volume.

Why safety keeps the scale small

The paper states that plasma generated by a femtosecond laser pulse is 'safer than that generated by a nanosecond laser', the reason the authors frame this approach as usable near a hand or fingertip rather than only at industrial laser power. That relative-safety claim is not the same as a certified safety rating, and nothing in the source reviewed here states a specific laser safety class or an approved exposure limit. The centimetre-scale volume reported is consistent with keeping both optics and laser power manageable at a research-lab scale; nothing in the paper claims a path to a room-sized version.

Questions to bring to a demo

• What certified laser safety class governs a given installation, and under what conditions was that class tested?
• Has the 200,000-point-per-second scanning approach been demonstrated outside the original paper's cited setup?
• What actually limits the working volume, beyond the optics the authors call 'scalable'?

This is squarely a research demonstration: a real physical mechanism, precisely measured at small scale, with scaling treated in the paper as a future possibility rather than an achieved fact.

Sources & reading trail

States the femtosecond-laser plasma mechanism, the two scanning rates achieved, the roughly 1cm3 working volume, and the relative-safety claim for femtosecond over nanosecond pulses.

Source published: 22 June 2015 · Retrieved: 16 September 2026

Confirms peer-reviewed publication in ACM Transactions on Graphics, dating the SIGGRAPH-linked version to 2016.

Source published: 19 February 2016 · Retrieved: 16 September 2026

Primary documents establish the record; the mechanism reading and the demo questions are Presence Atlas editorial analysis. This retrospective draft does not imply the site published on the event date.

Continue reading

• A trapped particle drew images visible from every angle
• The 2014 laser safety standard classifies hazard by output power
• A 2005 survey split true 3D displays into two working classes
• Browse the complete the archive

Published September 18, 2026, not on the date of the event described.